Psychological Capital And Sustainable Human Resource Management Shape Workforce Balance

Psychological Capital Dan Sustainable Human Resource Management Membentuk Keseimbangan Kerja

Authors

  • Jihan Sulaiman Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Sriwijaya
  • Fahmi Sulaiman Program Studi Manajemen Perusahaan, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Manajemen Sukma Medan
  • Kurdeniansyah Kurdeniansyah Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Sriwijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21070/psikologia.v11i2.2174

Keywords:

Psychological well-being, Psychological Capital, Sustainable Human Resource Management, Job Demands Resources, Work-Life Balance

Abstract

General Background: Burnout has become a major workplace challenge because it affects employee psychological well-being, productivity, innovation, and organizational sustainability. Specific Background: This study positions psychological well-being as a central pillar of sustainable human resource development by linking burnout, psychological capital, Job Demands–Resources theory, and Sustainable Human Resource Management. Knowledge Gap: Previous studies have often examined burnout, psychological well-being, psychological capital, and Sustainable Human Resource Management separately, leaving limited conceptual integration between individual psychological resources and organizational sustainability practices. Aims: This article aimed to develop the From Burnout to Balance conceptual model through a Systematic Literature Review using the PRISMA approach. Results: Ten relevant national and international articles published between 2015 and 2025 were synthesized from Scopus, Web of Science, and Garuda. The synthesis shows that burnout can be reduced through two main pathways: strengthening psychological capital and applying Sustainable Human Resource Management. Psychological capital, consisting of hope, efficacy, resilience, and optimism, functions as a protective psychological resource that helps employees cope with work pressure. Sustainable Human Resource Management creates a supportive work ecosystem by prioritizing well-being, work-life balance, and sustainable organizational practices. Psychological well-being is not only an outcome of healthy work conditions but also an indicator of long-term workforce balance. Novelty: The study proposes an integrated multilevel model connecting individual, psychological, and organizational dimensions in one conceptual framework. Implications: Organizations should place employee psychological well-being at the center of sustainable human resource strategies aligned with SDGs 3 and 8.

Highlights

• Hope, efficacy, resilience, and optimism work as protective resources against work pressure.
• Supportive HR practices create healthier, more adaptive organizational ecosystems.
• The proposed framework requires further empirical testing across broader work sectors.

Keywords

Psychological Capital; Sustainable Human Resource Management; Employee Well-Being; Job Demands Resources; Work-Life Balance

References

Avey, J. B., Luthans, F., & Jensen, S. M. (2009). Psychological capital: A positive resource for combating employee stress and turnover. Human Resource Management, 48(5), 677–693. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20294

Bai, B. (2025). Exploring Sustainable HRM Through the Lens of Employee Wellbeing. Sustainability, 17(12), 5646. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125646

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands‐Resources model: state of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job Demands–Resourcestheory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056

Ehnert, I., Harry, W., & Zink, K. J. (2014). Sustainability and Human Resource Management. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37524-8

Jamaluddin, Suhardy, Na’im, S., St.Hatidja, Djunaedi, Arifin, A. H., & Bahtiar, Y. (2024). Meta-Analysis of Work Life Balance Policies and Their Impact on Employee Well Being. E-Science Humanity Journal, 4(2), 419–425. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37296/esci.v4i2.155

Kramar, R. (2014). Beyond strategic human resource management: is sustainable human resource management the next approach? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(8), 1069–1089. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.816863

Lamuri, A., Shatri, H., Umar, J., Sudaryo, M. K., Malik, K., Sitepu, M. S., Saraswati, Muzellina, V. N., Nursyirwan, S. A., Idrus, M. F., Renaldi, K., & Abdullah, M. (2023). Burnout dimension profiles among healthcare workers in Indonesia. Heliyon, 9(3), e14519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14519

Lu, Y., Zhang, M. M., Yang, M. M., & Wang, Y. (2023). Sustainable human resource management practices, employee resilience, and employee outcomes: Toward common good values. Human Resource Management, 62(3), 331–353. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22153

Luthans, F., & Youssef-Morgan, C. M. (2017). Psychological Capital: An Evidence-Based Positive Approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4(1), 339–366. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113324

Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2016). Understanding the burnout experience: recent research and its implications for psychiatry. World Psychiatry, 15(2), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20311

Natalia, F., Zamralita, Z., & Lie, D. (2024). THE ROLE OF PSYCHOLOGICAL CAPITAL AND JOB RESOURCES ON WORK ENGAGEMENT AMONG GENERATION Z EMPLOYEES. Biopsikososial: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Mercubuana Jakarta, 8(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.22441/biopsikososial.v8i1.23445

Putri, I. D., Nugrahany, W., & Puspitawati, I. (2024). Effect of Burnout and Work-Life Balance on Psychological well-being in Full-Time Working Women. Jurnal Sains Psikologi, 13(2), 204. https://doi.org/10.17977/um023v13i22024p204-214

Rahmadani, V. G., Schaufeli, W. B., & Stouten, J. (2020). How engaging leaders foster employees’ work engagement. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(8), 1155–1169. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-01-2020-0014

Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness Is Everything, or Is It? Explorations on the Meaning of Psychological well-being. In Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (Vol. 57, Issue 6).

Schaufeli, W. B., Desart, S., & De Witte, H. (2020). Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT)—Development, Validity, and Reliability. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(24), 9495. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249495

Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. Free Press.

Siti Karnila, Tjijik Hamidah, & Sri Cahya Kencana. (2025). Hubungan Beban Kerja Dengan Burnout Pada Karyawan Perusahaan X di Bidang Transportasi Logistik. Jurnal Semesta Ilmu Manajemen Dan Ekonomi, 1(4), 809–822. https://doi.org/10.71417/j-sime.v1i4.463

Sulaiman, J., Effendy, S., & Lubis, R. (2023). THE EFFECT OF JOB INSECURITY AND SOCIAL SUPPORT TOWARD PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING AMONG OUTSOURCED EMPLOYEES AT COMPANY X of MEDAN. Jurnal Ekonomi, 12(3), 720–727.

Warr, P., & Nielsen, K. (2018). Wellbeing and work performance. In E. Diener, S. Oishi, & L. Tay (Eds.), Handbook of well-being. DEF Publishers.

World Health Organization. (2019). Burn-out an “occupational phenomenon”: International Classification of Diseases. https://www.who.int/news/item/28-05-2019-burn-out-an-occupational-phenomenon

Zia Riani,Rokman, I. N. (2025). Fenomena Burnout di Kalangan Guru Pascapandemi: Studi Kasus di Sekolah Negeri dan Swasta. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 1(2), 77–83.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-25

Most read articles by the same author(s)