Group Counseling With Choice Theory To Increase Student Achievement Motivation
Konseling Kelompok Dengan Choice Theory Untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Berprestasi Siswa
-
(1) * Eko Hardi Ansyah
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo
Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
The Student Achievement Motivation is an encouragement of student to obtain the learning achievement. The low of this motivation can affect the low of learning achievement. In consequence, it required an effort to improve this achievement motivation. The Group Counseling represent counseling that utilizing group to teach the client about how to think, plan, and behave effectively which is hypothesized could improve the student achievement motivation. This research aims to know the effectiveness of group counseling with choice thery to improve the student achievement motivation. This research is conducted by experimental design to 18 students with low learning achievement. The subjects were divided into two groups, that is, control and experimental group. In control group, researcher doesn't give the treatment. In experimental group, the researcher give the treatment in the form of group counseling with choice theory. Data analyzed for the result of student achievement tha conducted in pretest and posttest with covarian analysis. The result shows that there is different between control and experimental group with F(2,15) = 5,545; p = 0,033; p < 0,05; n2 = 0,27, so hypothesis that there is different between the student achievement motivation with low learning achievement based on participation in group counseling with choice theory is accepted. Thereby, the group counseling with choice theory treatment is proven to improve the student achievement with low learning motivation in experimental group. This treatment contribution to improve the student achievement motivation with low learning achievement is about 27%. So that this treatment could be conducted to solve the low learning achievement student.
References
Abbort, W. J. (1980). Banking on your interests. In N. Glasser(Ed.),Whatareyoudoing?. NewYork: Harper & Row.
Covington, M.V. (2000). Intrinsic Versus Extrinsic Motivation in Schools: A Reconsiliation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 9(1) p. 22-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00052
D'Rozario, V., & Romano, J.L. (2000). Perceptions of Counselor effectiveness: A Study of Two Country Groups. Counseling Psychology Quarterly, 14, 51-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070050011060
Eisele, Heather; Zand, Debra H.; Thomson, Nicole Renick. (2009). The Role of Sex, Self-Perception, and School Bonding in Predicting Achievement among Midle Class African American Early Adolescence. Adolescence, Libra Publisher Inc.
Ettin, Mark F. (1992). Foundation and Aplication of Group Psychotherapy: A Sphere of Influence. Boston : Allyn and Bacon.
Jalongo, Mary Renck. (2007). Beyond Benchmarks and Scores: Reasserting The Role of Motivation and Interest in Children's Academic Achievement: An ACEI position paper. Childhood Education: Association of Childhood Education International. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2007.10522958
Jawa Pos, 20 Januari 2011. Harian.
Kayler, H., & Sherman, J. (2009). At-risk ninth-grade students: A psychoeducational group approach to increase studyskills and grade point averages. Professional School Counseling, 12, 434-439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5330/PSC.n.2010-12.434
Kim, Jong Un. (2008). The Effect of a R/T Group Counseling Program on The Internet Addiction Level and Self-Esteem of Internet Addiction University Students. Journal of Reality Therapy. Vol.XXVII, number 2.
Maisaroh, Siti. (2010). Hubungan Penyesuaian Diri dan Prestasi Belajar Siswa kelas X SMA Shalahuddin Malang. Skripsi tidak diterbitkan. Program Studi Psikologi, Jurusan Bimbingan Konseling dan Psikologi, Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Negeri Malang.
McLeod, John. (2008). Pengantar Konseling : Teori dan studi kasus. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
McMilland, J.H., Schumaker, S. (2001). Research in Education. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Morgan, C. T. & King, R. A. (1995). Introduction to Psychology. Tokyo: Mcgraw Hill.
Purwaningsih, Iin. 2011. Pengaruh Intelegensi dan Kreativitas Siswa terhadap Prestasi Belajar Ekonomi pada Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Bendosari Sukoharjo Tahun Pelajaran 2010/2011. Skripsi tidak diterbitkan. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Ringnes, Thomas A. (1967). Identification Pattern, Motivation, and School Achievement of Bright Junior High School Boys. Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 58, issue 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0020040
Sugiyono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.
Uhlinger, Carolyn A. & Stephens, Mark A. (1960). Relation of Achievement Motivation to Academic Achievement in Student of Superior Ability. Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 51, issue 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041083
Widhiarso, W. (2010). Aplikasi Analisis Kovarian dalam Psikologi Eksperimen. Manuskrip tidak dipublikasikan. Fakultas Psikologi UGM, Yogyakarta.
Wilkins, Natalie & Kuperminc, Gabriel. (2009). Family Processes Promoting Achievement Motivation and Academic Success among Latino Youth. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the SCRA Biennial Meeting, Montclair State University, Montclair, New Jersey, June 18, 2009. Diakses dari http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p301433_in dex.html tanggal 17 Juni 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/e628592012-366
Wubbolding, R. E. (2000). Reality therapy for the 21st century. Muncie, IN: Accelerated Development.
Copyright (c) 2013 Eko Hardi Ansyah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
